Fighting Trump will make or break Disney’s new CEO: Josh D’Amaro
Newly appointed Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro faces an unexpected battle with the Trump administration as Disney-owned ABC accuses the FCC of violating its First Amendment rights. The dispute centers on an FCC investigation into “The View” over the “equal time” rule, despite the show's long-standing exemption. This confrontation marks a pivotal moment for D'Amaro, challenging Disney's past strategies of appeasement and forcing a direct stand against government pressure.
A week into his tenure, newly appointed Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro finds himself unexpectedly thrust into a high-stakes confrontation with the Trump administration over free speech. Disney-owned ABC has formally accused the administration of violating its First Amendment rights, stemming from an ongoing Federal Communications Commission (FCC) investigation into its popular talk show, “The View.” This escalating dispute marks an abrupt shift from D’Amaro’s initial focus on expanding Disney Plus and is now poised to define the early days of his leadership.
The Heart of the Dispute: “The View” and Equal Time
The core of ABC’s complaint to the FCC centers on an investigation into whether “The View” violated the “equal time” rule. This longstanding regulation requires broadcasters to provide competing political candidates with comparable airtime. The FCC’s scrutiny follows segments on “The View” featuring James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett, two Texas Democratic candidates, without subsequently inviting Republican counterparts.
ABC’s filing asserts that “The View” received an exemption from the equal time rule “more than twenty years ago,” recognizing it as a “bona fide news interview program.” The company argues that the FCC’s current actions against the show threaten to “chill core First Amendment-protected speech for years and potentially decades to come,” raising concerns about selective regulation of media perspectives.
A Pattern of Pressure: Trump’s History with Disney
This isn’t the first instance of the Trump administration, particularly under FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, applying pressure to Disney. Previously, Carr threatened to revoke broadcast licenses of stations airing “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” over a joke about Republican reactions, prompting ABC to temporarily pull the show. More recently, the FCC ordered Disney-owned ABC stations in eight markets to renew their broadcast licenses by May 28th, years ahead of their scheduled 2028 renewal. The agency has also signaled broader intentions to revoke equal time exemptions for other daytime and late-night talk shows.
Historically, Disney has attempted to navigate tensions with the Trump administration through various means. This includes former CEO Bob Iger settling a defamation suit with Trump for $15 million in 2024 and Bob Chapek’s decision not to condemn Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, even amidst employee walkouts. However, these attempts at appeasement have evidently not deterred the administration from targeting the company.
Past Strategies Fail, New Leadership Emerges
In stark contrast, Paramount’s strategy of apparent capitulation, such as canceling “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” – a move it attributed to cost-saving – seemed to coincide with favorable regulatory conditions for its $8 billion acquisition deal with Skydance. This suggests that some companies have found success in currying favor with the administration, a path that has proven ineffective for Disney.
FCC Democratic Commissioner Anna M. Gomez, in a direct letter to D’Amaro, highlighted this dynamic, stating that Disney’s 2024 settlement with Trump “told this Administration that pressure works.” Gomez emphasized that the First Amendment “does not belong to this Administration to grant or withhold,” instead belonging to the public, the press, and broadcasters willing to defend it.
The Path Forward: A Defining Battle for D’Amaro
ABC’s firm stance, asserting that the FCC is actively chilling free speech, represents a notable shift for Disney. For years, the company primarily played defense against conservative criticism regarding its “woke” content featuring marginalized groups. Now, under D’Amaro, there appears to be a realization that past self-censorship and financial settlements have not insulated Disney from administrative attacks.
Rather than follow in the footsteps of his predecessors, D’Amaro seems to recognize that the only viable path forward is to directly challenge the Trump administration, even if it leads to prolonged and costly legal battles. While such a fight is daunting for any CEO, especially in their first year, this showdown is poised to become a defining moment for D’Amaro’s leadership and his commitment to the company’s journalistic principles.
FAQ
Q: What is the “equal time” rule that “The View” is accused of violating?
A: The “equal time” rule, formally known as the equal opportunities rule, requires radio and television broadcasters to provide competing political candidates with equal access and time to present their views.
Q: Why is the FCC investigating “The View” now, given its long-standing exemption?
A: The FCC is scrutinizing “The View” after it featured two Democratic candidates for Texas Senate seats without subsequently inviting Republican candidates. Despite the show’s decades-old exemption as a “bona fide news interview program,” the FCC appears to be re-evaluating its application.
Q: What are the potential consequences for Disney if the FCC's investigation proceeds?
A: If the FCC proceeds, Disney could face an “ugly, expensive, and exhausting legal battle” defending its First Amendment rights. The FCC has already ordered early license renewals for some ABC stations and signaled broader plans to revoke equal time exemptions for other talk shows, indicating potential widespread regulatory challenges.
Related articles
Achieve Unbreakable 3D Prints: Understanding the New Computational
Learn how a new computational model will revolutionize FFF 3D printing by solving weak interlayer bonding, leading to significantly stronger, more reliable parts with automated optimization.
Kalshi Bans George Santos for Life Over Investigation Non-Compliance
Prediction market platform Kalshi has issued its first-ever lifetime ban to former Republican congressman George Santos. The move, announced Monday, comes after Santos reportedly failed to cooperate with an internal company investigation. This adds another chapter to the controversies surrounding the former House member, who was expelled from Congress in 2023.
Android 17 QPR2 Beta 4: Status Bar Refresh - A Welcome, If Late
The Android 17 QPR2 Beta 4 introduces new, long-awaited status bar customization options, allowing users to hide system and notification icons. While not groundbreaking compared to other Android OEMs, this feature significantly enhances the user experience for Pixel device owners by providing a cleaner, more personalized interface.
Professor Murder Rides the Subway is a forgotten slice of dance punk
In a recent digital archaeology expedition, Terrence O'Brien, Weekend Editor at The Verge, unearthed and lauded Professor Murder's 2006 EP, "Professor Murder Rides the Subway," as a quintessential, yet largely
ai: Musk’s faster path to more gas turbines comes with pollution
Elon Musk's SpaceX is building a secret Texas foundry to produce gas turbine blades, aiming to accelerate AI data center power by 18 months. This addresses a critical energy bottleneck, but faces environmental backlash over pollution and health risks from gas turbines.
Robotaxis' Hidden Human Cost: Test Drivers Injured
An exclusive TechCrunch investigation reveals a hidden human cost in the robotaxi industry, with Waymo and Zoox test drivers suffering over two dozen injuries from sudden autonomous vehicle movements in 2024-2025. These incidents, including whiplash, sideline workers for months, challenging the industry's safety narrative. The report highlights occupational hazards for those at the forefront of AV development and raises questions about broader industry reporting as the sector expands.